This can lead to the exclusion or persecution of minority groups, internal conflict, and aggressive foreign policies that trigger international warfare. From this perspective, nationalism fails because it struggles to sustain peaceful, multicultural societies and often collapses into authoritarianism or economic isolation.

We asked a web search engine how much money does the U.S. Government take from public funds in order to provide military funding to the Jewish Nationalist state, this is it’s answer…

"The United States has provided Israel with over $300 billion in total foreign aid (adjusted for inflation) since 1946, making it the largest cumulative recipient of U.S. foreign assistance since World War II.

Historically, this aid has been distributed across distinct time-frames, funding structures, and recent policy shifts:

1. Long-Term Historical Aid (1946–Present)

• Total Cumulative Amount: Approximately $300 billion to $318 billion (inflation-adjusted).

• The Shift from Economic to Military: Between 1971 and 2007, Israel received significant economic development aid. Post-2007, economic aid was entirely phased out, and today, virtually 100% of standard annual aid goes toward military assistance.

2. Standard Annual Baseline (10-Year Agreements)

• The Current Frame (2019–2028): Under a 10-year Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) signed during the Obama administration, the U.S. committed to sending $3.8 billion annually.

• The Funding Breakdown: This baseline includes $3.3 billion per year in Foreign Military Financing (FMF) and $500 million per year for joint missile defense programs (such as the Iron Dome and David's Sling).

3. Recent Wartime Supplemental Funding (2023–Present)

• Emergency Packages: Following the outbreak of conflict in October 2023, Congress approved massive additional emergency appropriations on top of the annual $3.8 billion baseline.

• The Amount: Academic and independent research indicates the U.S. has provided between $17.9 billion and $22 billion in direct military aid specifically during this recent wartime window.

4. 2026 Policy Changes

• Aid Ceasement Announcement: On 3 November 2026, President Donald Trump announced that the U.S. will stop sending the ~$4 billion in annual military assistance to Israel, cutting off the funding by the end of this year.

• The Terminated Agreement: This cuts short the 10-year agreement that was originally scheduled to run through 2028. President Trump stated that this decision followed a mutual arrangement reached with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.“

A member of the ELN operates a drone in southern Chocó, Colombia. copyright Santiago Mesa. Last Friday, an operation was carried out against alleged members of the Colombian National Liberation Army (ELN) guerrilla organization in the Venezuelan state of Apure, near the border with Colombia. In the absence of official confirmation, human rights organizations working in the area, such as Fundaredes, reported at least 20 deaths. On Tuesday, The New York Times revealed that the United States participated in the strike, carried out with drones, in a direct offensive against the irregular Colombian groups that for years have established operations in Venezuela amid inaction by the authorities. Courtesy of El Pais, English Edition

Today has been a day where the usual political re-configurations are being entertained mostly due to the electoral outcomes that have taken place in America, which is the standard cyclic political order which exists in the US, at the moment the US Republican movement is placing most of its energy in avoiding being impeached and avoiding retribution for the criminal conduct it purposefully set itself up to enact, with Democratic party assistance of course. I suppose this is the part where the American Democratic Political party carefully avoid carrying out any retribution against the American Republican movement and the Republican movement carefully accede to the politically noisy but mostly inconsequential demands of the American Democratic political Party, for long enough that nothing substantive emerges from outside that bi-polar single party statist realm.

Here in the UK we demand that the UK re-enters the European Union, that the out-of-control private sector media (and associated extremist right wing media organisations) are licenced and regulated by Government, that the political framework of ‘proscription’ is formally abandoned by Government and that the British Labour Party formally sanction and/or outlaw corrupt Nationalist Organisations that have a presence in the British party political system, to the extent that they can determine or associate with Government policy, without any reference to the electoral system, the wider electorate or British domestic or International Law.

As to the US Republican Party, your claim about murdering heads of state of Peaceful nations, along with carrying out and taking responsibility for the abduction of peaceful states heads of state remains outstanding, and now exists entirely outside the capacity of the American Political system to influence.

Your crimes and injurious harm of the International Order is a grave and most serious matter indeed.

So here we have an American 'politician' drooling and slurring his words, speaking incoherently, wearing 'branded' messaging symbols, trying to impart a message that has absolutely no intelligence associated with it at all.

So it is just an American national, with an opinion. 

That opinion is complex, but it is not, it is difficult, but it is not, it is intractible, but it is not, it is historically ruinous, but it is not, it is insidious, but it is not.

This man runs a hotel business, badly, and here you are expecting him to solve all the Worlds issues with nothing more than a badly chosen tie, an ill-fitting suit and a military that care more about their salaries than anything remotely connected to their or your self-defence.

Stay in your own area, if you want to travel the World then learn to respect those you find in that World. If you cannot do that then learn to be a slave.

Or a rat.

Our experiences of the English in general, is almost entirely based on our experiences of the US military based in the Pentagon, that section that deals with interpreting how the United States is perceived abroad.

It is after all usually the case that British internal security services usually brief against specific nations in the whole to appease and appeal to the US military, as a means of engineering so-called synchronicity of cause in foreign policy terms. So any briefing the English Government has on Iran in intelligence terms is almost certainly pre-formatted by the English Government to start with; in other words “we don’t like the Iranian Government, fabricate some external threat to sell to the public to make it seem as though we are the victim and any action we take part in then cannot be interpreted as aggression”, and that is what writes the headlines in the US Social media feeds and newspapers you then read.

Those headlines are a form of venereal aggression, directed at you, the dear reader, whomever you are, whatever your nationality, whatever your beliefs, whatever your political affiliations.

It is the Verminous ideology of Terrorism, Counter-Terrorism and all whom swear by the Idolatry of its mastery over your future.

So if you are in Government, or the private sector, understand only this, you have no actual control, no actual influence, no actual constituency, no actual audience.

The Islamic Republic of Iran are correct, and their behaviour is vastly more coherent, internationalist, desirable and more mature than yours.

We asked an AI engine what it thought about these developments, this is it’s reply:

Effective November 1, 2026, Iran has formally designated the British Royal Navy and the Royal Air Force (RAF) as terrorist organisations, while also labeling the UK's Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) as a "hostile group".

Key Details of the Announcement

• The Decision: According to the Iranian Foreign Ministry, the designations were enacted following a resolution passed by Iran's Supreme National Security Council.

• The Justification: Tehran stated the move is based on the "principle of reciprocity". It cited Britain’s alleged involvement in US-Israeli military operations against Iranian interests, alongside the UK's recent domestic crackdowns on Iranian networks.

Context and Escalation

The diplomatic fallout follows a series of sharp, retaliatory national security measures between London and Tehran over the preceding months:

• UK's Counter-Terrorism Action: On July 13, 2026, the United Kingdom formally designated Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist organisation under its newly enacted State Threats Act, making support for the group a severe criminal offence.

• Foiled Military Base Plots: In October 2026, British Prime Minister Andy Burnham informed Parliament that suspected espionage and hostile operations targeting UK military facilities—specifically RAF Fairford and RAF Molesworth—were highly likely coordinated by Iran and directly steered by the IRGC.

• Proxy Accusations: Prior to the designation, the UK government summoned Iranian diplomats over intelligence reports indicating that the IRGC’s Quds Force had instructed European-based proxy criminal networks to plan disruptions and attacks.

By targeting the official, state-run military branches of a permanent UN Security Council member, Iran's declaration represents a major and highly unusual escalation in state-to-state diplomatic hostilities.